Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 15 | Android 5.1 |
| -- | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.09 x 2.88 x 0.35 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 6.03 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 431 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.7 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Google Tensor G3 (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Immortalis-G715s MC10 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| -- | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has a general score of 79.3, which is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 9a (Rumored)'s 75.7 general score. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has older 5.1 version while Google Pixel 9a (Rumored) has Android 15. The Galaxy Note 5 features a much more vibrant display than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a little more pixels per display inch.
The Google Pixel 9a (Rumored) has a much better memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy Note 5 has a much faster processing unit than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), although it has 4 GB lesser RAM, they both have 1 CPU cores.
The Google Pixel 9a (Rumored) takes clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Google Pixel 9a (Rumored) also has faster video frame rates and a way more mega-pixels camera in the back. Samsung Galaxy Note 5 counts with a much longer battery duration than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored).
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.