Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 15 | -- |
| -- | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.09 x 2.88 x 0.35 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 5.75 ounces |
| -- | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 431 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Google Tensor G3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Immortalis-G715s MC10 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| -- | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 1.36 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S9 has a global score of 83.3, which is much better than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored)'s score of 75.7. The Galaxy S9 counts with a much better performance than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with more cpu cores. The Galaxy S9 has a sharper display than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater quantity of pixels per display inch and a higher 1440 x 2960 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S9 features more memory for apps and games than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 400 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S9 has a camera that is just as good as Google Pixel 9a (Rumored)'s camera, although the Samsung Galaxy S9 has a worse (4K) video resolution and a way worse 12 MP resolution back camera.
The Samsung Galaxy S9 has a very superior battery performance than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored).
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.