Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| 2016-10-20 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gray | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 869.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel XL has a score of 81.3, which is slightly better than LG V20's 77 score. Although the Google Pixel XL and the LG V20 were released only a few months apart, the Google Pixel XL design is thicker but also a little lighter than the LG V20. The Google Pixel XL counts with a slightly better display than LG V20, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have the same 1440 x 2560 resolution, the Google Pixel XL also counts with a little better pixels density.
LG V20 counts with a very superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel XL, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V20 and Google Pixel XL feature quite similar processing units, both have a Quad-Core CPU and 4 GB of RAM.
LG V20 has just a bit better camera than Google Pixel XL, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor taking less light and washed colors, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the LG V20 also counts with a way better resolution camera in the back and a bigger camera aperture to capture better photos and video in low-light situations.
The Google Pixel XL counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than LG V20, because it has 3450mAh of battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel XL is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG V20. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Google Pixel XL, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the LG V20, resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.