Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-10-20 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gray | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 869.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel XL has an overall score of 81.3, which is a bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's global score of 77.8. Although the Google Pixel XL is incredibly older and noticeably thicker than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's body is still lighter. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a way better looking screen than Google Pixel XL, because although it has a quite worse display pixels density, it also counts with a better resolution of 2200 x 2480 and a really bigger screen.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel XL, because it has 512 GB internal memory. The Google Pixel XL has a much more powerful CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 12 GB less RAM and lesser cores (but faster). Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better battery life than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 65 percent more battery size.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better camera than Google Pixel XL, because it has a much more megapixels back facing camera, a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better photography and videos in low light environments, a lot higher video quality and a way larger sensor which gives a much higher image and video quality.
Google Pixel XL not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.