Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-10-20 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gray | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 869.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel XL is a bit better than vivo X60 Pro, having a overall score of 81.3 against 78.8. The Google Pixel XL is an a lot older and somewhat thicker cellphone than vivo X60 Pro, but Google managed to make it just a little bit lighter anyway. The vivo X60 Pro counts with a greater hardware performance than Google Pixel XL, because it has 8 GB more RAM and a larger number of cores.
Google Pixel XL features a bit sharper display than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel count in each display inch and a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution. The vivo X60 Pro features a very superior camera than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the vivo X60 Pro also has a bigger aperture to capture better photography in low light situations, a way more megapixels camera, higher 60 fps video frame rate and a bigger sensor.
The vivo X60 Pro has a much bigger memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel XL, because it has 128 GB more internal memory. The vivo X60 Pro counts with improved battery performance than Google Pixel XL, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.