Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 88.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| -- | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2016-10-20 | 2020-10-23 |
| 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black, Blue, Green, Purple, Red and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 829.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 12 has a global score of 88.7, which is better than Google Pixel's general score of 80.2. IPhone 12's design is extremely newer and thinner than the Google Pixel's, but it's also somewhat heavier. Apple iPhone 12 features a more powerful processor than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Apple iPhone 12 also has a greater number of cores and a 64-bits CPU.
The iPhone 12 has a sharper screen than Google Pixel, because it has a little higher pixel number in each inch in the screen, a better 1170 x 2532px resolution and a bigger display. Google Pixel counts with a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than iPhone 12, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Apple iPhone 12 has just a little better battery lifetime than Google Pixel, because it has 2815mAh of battery capacity instead of 2770mAh. The iPhone 12 takes just a bit better photos and videos than Google Pixel, because although it has a back-facing camera with a worse 12 MP resolution and a lower (4K) video definition, it also counts with a larger aperture for better images in low light situations.
Although iPhone 12 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Google Pixel, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Pixel. If you want to save some dollars, you can get Google Pixel, letting go a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.