Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| 2016-10-20 | 2017-11-03 |
| 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone X has an overall score of 88.1, which is just a bit better than Google Pixel's 80.2 general score. IPhone X is a newer and thinner cellphone than Google Pixel, but it's somewhat heavier. The iPhone X features a bit sharper display than Google Pixel, because it has a bigger screen, a just a bit more pixels per screen inch and a bit higher resolution of 1125 x 2436.
IPhone X features a superior processing power than Google Pixel, because although it has less RAM, it also counts with a greater number of cores and a 64 bits processing unit. IPhone X counts with much more storage capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel, because it has more internal storage.
Apple iPhone X has a slightly better camera than Google Pixel, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a less mega-pixels camera in the back and a lot smaller sensor which offers a much worse photo and video quality, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light photos and videos.
IPhone X's battery life is just as good as the battery performance in Google Pixel, although the iPhone X has 2716mAh of battery capacity.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Google Pixel, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Pixel. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy Google Pixel, giving up some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.