Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-10-20 | 2021-06-25 |
| 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches | 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2676 x 1236 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 440 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 17.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel is a bit better than Honor 50 Pro, having an 80.2 score against 77. Even though the Google Pixel is a lot older and a bit thicker than the Honor 50 Pro, it's construction is still noticeably lighter. Honor 50 Pro counts with a little bit better screen than Google Pixel, because although it has a quite lower pixels density, it also counts with a better 1236 x 2676px resolution and a lot larger screen.
Honor 50 Pro has a bit more powerful processing unit than Google Pixel, because it has 4 more CPU cores and more RAM. Honor 50 Pro features a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Honor 50 Pro counts with a very superior battery performance than Google Pixel, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. The Honor 50 Pro shoots a lot better photos and videos than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Honor 50 Pro also has a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels and a bigger aperture for better photography in low-light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.