Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 92.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-10-20 | 2024-03-22 |
| 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 8.36 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Agate Grey and Frozen Berry |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | $ 1389.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2800 x 1280 pixels |
| AMOLED | LTPO |
| 441 pixels per inch | 453 pixels per inch |
| -- | 5000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 10.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 24 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 1 TB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 23.2 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 7.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
Comparison review
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is better than the Google Pixel, with a global score of 92.1 against 80.2. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is a newer phone than Google Pixel, although it's just a bit thicker and noticeably heavier. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a much better screen than Google Pixel, because it has a just a little higher pixel number in each inch of screen, a higher 1280 x 2800 resolution and a much larger display.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a quite superior hardware performance than Google Pixel, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a higher number of cores. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features a very superior camera than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has a way better 50 megapixels resolution back facing camera, a way bigger camera sensor shooting much better quality photographs, higher video frame rates and a lot bigger diafragm aperture.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a much greater memory to store more apps and games than Google Pixel, because it has 1 TB internal storage. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features a way better battery life than Google Pixel, because it has 5600mAh of battery capacity.
Although Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Google Pixel, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Google Pixel, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.