Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-10-20 | 2021-09-01 |
| 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52s is much better than the Google Pixel, with a 91.1 score against 80.2. The Samsung Galaxy A52s construction is newer and a little bit thinner, but extremely heavier than Google Pixel. The Google Pixel has a bit sharper display than Galaxy A52s, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 1920px resolution and a really smaller display, it also counts with a just a little better number of pixels in each inch of screen.
Samsung Galaxy A52s features a bit more powerful processing unit than Google Pixel, because it has more RAM and 4 more CPU cores. Galaxy A52s captures a lot better photographs and videos than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Galaxy A52s also has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better captures and video in low-light situations, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor and a back facing camera with a much better 64 mega pixels resolution.
The Galaxy A52s has a much better storage to store more games and applications than Google Pixel, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy A52s also has a SD extension slot that supports up to 1 TB. Galaxy A52s counts with a superior battery performance than Google Pixel, because it has a 62% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.