Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-10-20 | 2019-03-08 |
| 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 has a general score of 88.3, which is much better than the Google Pixel's 80.2 general score. Although Samsung Galaxy S10 is just a bit heavier than Google Pixel, it's a little bit thinner and extremely newer. The Galaxy S10 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel, because it has more RAM and a greater number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 features just a bit better looking screen than Google Pixel, because it has a lot higher 1440 x 3040 resolution, a little bit more pixels per screen inch and a bigger display. The Samsung Galaxy S10 has a much greater memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S10 also has a SD extension slot that supports up to 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 takes a little bit better videos and photos than Google Pixel, because although it has a worse 12 megapixels resolution camera, a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a tinier sensor capturing lower quality images, it also counts with a lot larger camera aperture. Galaxy S10 counts with improved battery duration than Google Pixel, because it has a 23% greater battery size.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Samsung Galaxy S10 is also the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.