Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2016-10-20 | 2020-02-03 |
| 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 Lite is much better than Google Pixel, having a score of 89.7 against 80.2. The Galaxy S10 Lite body is newer and just a little bit thinner than Google Pixel's, although it is incredibly heavier. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a bit better processor than Google Pixel, because it has a higher number of cores (and also faster) and a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel counts with a little bit better looking display than Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a really smaller display and a bit worse 1080 x 1920px resolution, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch of display. The Galaxy S10 Lite features a lot bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has a SD card slot that admits up to 1000 GB.
The Galaxy S10 Lite features a superior battery life than Google Pixel, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 2770mAh. Galaxy S10 Lite captures way better pictures and videos than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution, a larger back camera sensor taking better quality pictures and videos and faster video frame rate.
The Galaxy S10 Lite is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also cheap compared to the Google Pixel.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.