Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2016-10-20 | 2020-03-06 |
| 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is way better than the Google Pixel, with a 98 score against 80.2. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G construction is incredibly newer than the Google Pixel's, although it is noticeably heavier and a bit thicker. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a bit better processing power than Google Pixel, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and more cores.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a slightly better looking display than Google Pixel, because it has a much bigger display, a little higher number of pixels per inch in the display and a lot better 1440 x 3200 resolution. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a way bigger memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a way better battery performance than Google Pixel, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a lot better camera than Google Pixel, because it has a larger back-facing camera sensor taking better quality photos and videos, a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photos and video, a much higher video definition and a back camera with way more MP.
Although Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Google Pixel, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, else you can save some dollars and buy the Google Pixel, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.