Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-10-20 | 2021-09-30 |
| 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel has a score of 80.2, which is a bit better than vivo X70 Pro's 78.3 overall score. The Google Pixel construction is notably lighter than vivo X70 Pro, although it's just a bit thicker and was released 5 years before. The vivo X70 Pro has a better processing unit than Google Pixel, because it has more cores and a higher amount of RAM memory.
Google Pixel features a little more vivid display than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920px and a way smaller screen, it also counts with a bit greater screen pixels density. The vivo X70 Pro takes way better pictures and videos than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the vivo X70 Pro also has better 60 fps video frame rate, a bigger camera aperture to capture better photos and video in poorly lited environments, a back-facing camera with a way higher 50 megapixels resolution and a way bigger camera sensor taking lot higher quality videos and photos.
The vivo X70 Pro counts with a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel, because it has 256 GB internal memory. Vivo X70 Pro has a very superior battery performance than Google Pixel, because it has 4450mAh of battery capacity instead of 2770mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.