Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-25 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.30 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Black, Blue and White |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 has an overall score of 81.6, which is a bit better than the Honor 50's 74.5 score. The Google Pixel 2 body is lighter than the Honor 50, although it's just a little thicker and was released many years before. Honor 50 counts with a little bit better processing power than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Honor 50 also has more RAM memory.
Google Pixel 2 features a bit more vivid display than Honor 50, because although it has a way smaller display and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 1920px, it also counts with a quite better count of pixels in each screen inch. The Honor 50 captures way better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low-light photography, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Honor 50 also counts with a lot better 108 MP resolution back-facing camera.
The Google Pixel 2 has as much memory capacity for games and applications as the Honor 50 one, they have exactly the same internal memory capacity. Honor 50 features a much longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 59% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.