Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-25 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.30 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 has a general score of 89, which is much better than Honor 50's general score of 74.5. Although the Google Pixel 5 and Honor 50 were released only 8 months apart, the Google Pixel 5 design is a little bit thicker but also lighter. The Google Pixel 5 counts with a slightly better looking screen than Honor 50, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the Google Pixel 5 also counts with a bit better number of pixels per inch of display.
The Google Pixel 5 has as much memory capacity to store more games and applications as Honor 50, both of them have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Google Pixel 5 has a processor that's very similar to the Honor 50 one, both have 8 processing cores and a 8 GB RAM. Honor 50 features just a bit longer battery duration than Google Pixel 5, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity.
Honor 50 counts with a superior camera than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low-light images and lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Honor 50 also counts with a back camera with a much higher 108 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.