Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-06-25 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.30 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Titan gray |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| -- | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 390 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG K92 is much better than the Honor 50, having a overall score of 85.4 against 74.5. Even being the best phone we are comparing here, we must highlight that it's also just a little thicker and somewhat heavier. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but LG K92 has older 10 version while Honor 50 has Android 11 version.
The Honor 50 features a bit better CPU than LG K92, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor 50 also has 2 GB more RAM. The LG K92 and Honor 50 both count with very similar displays, although the LG K92 also has a little bigger screen, a just a little more pixels per inch in the screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
LG K92 counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Honor 50, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the LG K92 also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Honor 50 captures just a bit better photos and videos than LG K92, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for shooting images and video in low-light situations, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Honor 50 also counts with a much higher 108 mega pixels resolution camera.
The Honor 50 features just a bit longer battery lifetime than LG K92, because it has a 4300mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.