Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy S II
NFCI9100P
| Global Score | |
| 60.3 | 66.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 4.1.2, 4.0.4, 4.0, 2.3 |
| 2018-05-22 | 2011-02-13 |
| 6.23 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 4.93 x 2.60 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 4.09 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Metal | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 242.00 | $ 190.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 4.3 inches |
| 1440 x 720 pixels | 480 x 800 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 268 pixels per inch | 217 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Samsung Exynos 4210 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A9 (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 1 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | ARM Mali-400 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.19 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 7.12 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.31 inches (1/3.2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 8.36 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 6.1 | 4.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 1650mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 710 hours standby time 18.3 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 3.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 3.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S II has a general score of 66.2, which is just a bit better than Honor 7C's 60.3 global score. The Galaxy S II is a notably older and a little thicker phone than the Honor 7C, but Samsung could make it way lighter anyway. Both devices in this comparison use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S II has 4.1.2 version while Honor 7C has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Honor 7C counts with a bit better processor than Galaxy S II, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with a greater number of cores (and faster) and 2 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy S II has a bit better screen than Honor 7C, although it has a lot smaller display, a little bit inferior amount of pixels per display inch and a lot lower resolution of 800 x 480px.
Honor 7C has a very superior memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S II, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Honor 7C also has a SD extension slot that admits up to 256 GB. Honor 7C features a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy S II, because it has an 82 percent bigger battery capacity.
The Honor 7C has a bit better camera than Galaxy S II, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Honor 7C also has a camera with a much better 13 mega pixels resolution and a larger diafragm aperture to take better captures in low-light environments.
Galaxy S II is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also by far the cheapest one, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.