Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-04-17 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.42 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Midnight black and Phantom purple | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Kirin 810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A76, Arm Cortex-A55 and DynamIQ, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP6 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.34 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Nexus 6P has an overall score of 80.3, which is much better than Honor 9X Pro's 71.9 general score. The Google Nexus 6P is an older cellphone than the Honor 9X Pro, but it's lighter and thinner anyway. The Honor 9X Pro has a bit more powerful processor than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Honor 9X Pro also has 3 GB more RAM.
The Google Nexus 6P features a little more vivid display than Honor 9X Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixel density and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution. The Honor 9X Pro counts with a superior camera than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Honor 9X Pro also has a much more megapixels camera, higher video frame rate, a bigger aperture for better low light photos and a bigger back camera sensor which gives a better photo and video quality.
The Honor 9X Pro has a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Nexus 6P, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 512 GB. Honor 9X Pro features a little longer battery performance than Google Nexus 6P, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.