Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-04-17 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.42 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Midnight black and Phantom purple | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Kirin 810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A76, Arm Cortex-A55 and DynamIQ, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP6 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.34 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 is much better than Honor 9X Pro, with a score of 81.6 against 71.9. Despite of the fact that the Google Pixel 2 is notably older than Honor 9X Pro, it's construction is notably lighter and somewhat thinner. The Google Pixel 2 has a CPU that's just as good as the Honor 9X Pro one, and although the Google Pixel 2 has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Google Pixel 2 has a bit sharper display than Honor 9X Pro, because although it has a little lower 1080 x 1920 resolution and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit better pixels density. The Honor 9X Pro counts with a very superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 2, because it has 256 GB internal memory and a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Honor 9X Pro features a much better camera than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same video definition and a F1.8 camera aperture, the Honor 9X Pro also has faster 60 frames per second video frame rates, a way larger sensor providing a much better image quality and a camera with a much higher 48 mega pixels resolution.
The Honor 9X Pro counts with a way better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.