Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-04-17 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.42 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Midnight black and Phantom purple | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 390 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Kirin 810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A76, Arm Cortex-A55 and DynamIQ, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP6 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V20 has a general score of 77, which is just a bit better than the Honor 9X Pro's general score of 71.9. The LG V20 is an extremely older phone than the Honor 9X Pro, but LG was able to make it somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner. LG V20 counts with a little more vivid display than Honor 9X Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater amount of pixels per screen inch and a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution.
Honor 9X Pro has a bit better performance than LG V20, because it has a larger number of cores and more RAM. Honor 9X Pro features a bigger memory capacity for apps and games than LG V20, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
The Honor 9X Pro takes much clearer photos and videos than LG V20, and although they both have the same camera aperture and the same (Full HD) video resolution, the Honor 9X Pro also has higher 60 frames per second video frame rates, a back facing camera with a much better 48 MP resolution and a much bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Honor 9X Pro features better battery duration than LG V20, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.