Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-17 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.42 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Midnight black and Phantom purple | Aurora black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Kirin 810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A76, Arm Cortex-A55 and DynamIQ, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP6 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ has an overall score of 83.7, which is better than the Honor 9X Pro's 71.9 score. The LG V50 ThinQ construction is somewhat lighter and a bit thinner than Honor 9X Pro, despite of the fact that it was released about 11 months before. Both of these devices work with the same Android 10 OS, so you shouldn't notice any difference in that aspect.
LG V50 ThinQ features a little sharper screen than Honor 9X Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater screen pixels density and a higher 1440 x 3120 resolution. Honor 9X Pro features just a bit bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 512 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Honor 9X Pro. Both have 6 GB of RAM memory and 8 cores. The Honor 9X Pro shoots a bit better pictures and videos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 60 fps video frame rate and the same (Full HD) video resolution, the Honor 9X Pro also counts with a much larger back camera sensor which offers a lot higher image and video quality and a lot higher resolution back-facing camera.
LG V50 ThinQ features a battery performance that's just as good as the battery life in Honor 9X Pro.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.