Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-17 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.42 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Midnight black and Phantom purple | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 390 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Kirin 810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A76, Arm Cortex-A55 and DynamIQ, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP6 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G is much better than the Honor 9X Pro, having a 91.8 score against 71.9. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A71 5G has 11 version while Honor 9X Pro has Android 10. Although the Galaxy A71 5G and the Honor 9X Pro were released only 2 months apart, the Galaxy A71 5G is somewhat lighter and just a little bit thinner.
Galaxy A71 5G counts with a slightly better looking display than Honor 9X Pro, because it has a little better count of pixels in each inch in the display, a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little larger screen. The Honor 9X Pro features a greater memory for games and applications than Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that allows 488 GB smaller, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy A71 5G has a little faster processing unit than Honor 9X Pro. Both of them have 8 cpu cores and a 6 GB RAM memory. Galaxy A71 5G has a slightly better camera than Honor 9X Pro, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a much better resolution back camera and a larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a higher image and video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a little longer battery life than Honor 9X Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.