Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-04-17 | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.42 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Midnight black and Phantom purple | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Kirin 810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A76, Arm Cortex-A55 and DynamIQ, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP6 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.34 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A80 has a general score of 84.9, which is better than Honor 9X Pro's 71.9 overall score. Even being the best we compare here, the Galaxy A80 body is older, just a little thicker and just a bit heavier than Honor 9X Pro. Samsung Galaxy A80 features a screen that is very similar to the display in Honor 9X Pro, although the Samsung Galaxy A80 also has a little larger screen, a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a bit greater pixels density.
The Honor 9X Pro has a very superior storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A80, because it has an external memory card slot that admits up to 512 GB and more internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy A80 and Honor 9X Pro count with very similar CPUs, and although the Samsung Galaxy A80 has more RAM, they both have 8 cores.
Honor 9X Pro captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy A80, and although they both have the same resolution camera in the back, a 0.5 inches sensor and the same (Full HD) video resolution, the Honor 9X Pro also has a bigger diafragm aperture to take better photography in low-light environments and higher 60 frames per second video frame rates.
The Honor 9X Pro counts with just a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A80, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.