Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 86.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-17 | 2020-03-05 |
| 6.42 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Midnight black and Phantom purple | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Kirin 810 chipset | Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A76, Arm Cortex-A55 and DynamIQ, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP6 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M31 is much better than Honor 9X Pro, with an 86.5 score against 71.9. Galaxy M31 is a just a little lighter phone than the Honor 9X Pro, but they are equally thin. Both devices in our current comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy M31 has a newer 11 version while Honor 9X Pro has Android 10 version, so it gives some additional features.
Galaxy M31 has a little more vivid display than Honor 9X Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Galaxy M31 also counts with a just a little higher pixel count per inch of display. Honor 9X Pro features a lot bigger storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy M31, and although they both have a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB, the Honor 9X Pro also has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy M31 counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Honor 9X Pro. They have the same number of cores and a 6 GB RAM memory. The Galaxy M31 counts with a much longer battery performance than Honor 9X Pro, because it has a 50 percent bigger battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy M31 takes a little bit better photos and videos than Honor 9X Pro, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy M31 also has a way better video definition, a larger sensor and a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.