Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-04-17 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.42 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Midnight black and Phantom purple | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Kirin 810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A76, Arm Cortex-A55 and DynamIQ, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP6 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note9 is a lot better than the Honor 9X Pro, with a global score of 87.1 against 71.9. The Galaxy Note9 is a a little lighter phone than the Honor 9X Pro, but both of them are equally thin. The Galaxy Note9 counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Honor 9X Pro. Both have a 6 GB RAM and 8 cpu cores.
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 has just a bit better display than Honor 9X Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2960 resolution and a greater screen density. The Honor 9X Pro takes a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low-light photos and video, and they both have the same video definition and the same 60 fps video frame rates, the Honor 9X Pro also counts with a camera with way more mega pixels and a way bigger sensor taking lot higher quality videos and photos.
Honor 9X Pro counts with a superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note9, and although they both have a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 512 GB, the Honor 9X Pro also has 128 GB more internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy Note9 features a battery performance that is just as good as the battery lifetime in Honor 9X Pro.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.