Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-04-17 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.42 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| Midnight black and Phantom purple | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Kirin 810 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A76, Arm Cortex-A55 and DynamIQ, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP6 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.34 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S6 edge+ has an overall score of 79.3, which is much better than Honor 9X Pro's score of 71.9. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S6 edge+ has the older 5.1 version and Honor 9X Pro has Android 10. Even though Galaxy S6 edge+ is older than the Honor 9X Pro, it's construction is extremely lighter and notably thinner.
The Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has a much better screen than Honor 9X Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a higher amount of pixels per screen inch. Honor 9X Pro has a superior storage for applications and games than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity and an external memory card slot that allows up to 512 GB.
Honor 9X Pro counts with just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a higher amount of RAM and 7 more cores. Honor 9X Pro features better battery performance than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a 4000mAh battery size. The Honor 9X Pro shoots much better videos and photos than Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video quality, the Honor 9X Pro also has a much more megapixels camera in the back, a much larger sensor shooting way better quality videos and pictures, higher 60 frames per second video frame rates and a larger aperture to take better photos and video in low-light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.