Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2020-04-17 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.42 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Midnight black and Phantom purple | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Kirin 810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A76, Arm Cortex-A55 and DynamIQ, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP6 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.34 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a bit better than the Honor 9X Pro, getting a 77.8 score against 71.9. Both phones in this review work with Android OS (Operating System), but vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a newer 14 version while Honor 9X Pro has Android 10 version, providing the user lots of additional features. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro construction is a lot newer and noticeably thinner, but a little bit heavier than Honor 9X Pro.
The Honor 9X Pro features a way better processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much sharper display than Honor 9X Pro, because it has a just a little better screen pixel density, a bigger screen and a much better resolution of 2200 x 2480px.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has slightly more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Honor 9X Pro, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much longer battery lifetime than Honor 9X Pro, because it has a 43% larger battery size.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes much clearer photos and videos than Honor 9X Pro, because it has a larger aperture to take better low-light photography, a much larger sensor, a way better video quality and a back facing camera with more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.