Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-04-17 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.42 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Midnight black and Phantom purple | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 390 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Kirin 810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A76, Arm Cortex-A55 and DynamIQ, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP6 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is better than the Honor 9X Pro, getting a global score of 85.5 against 71.9. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a somewhat lighter cellphone than Honor 9X Pro, but both of them have the same thickness. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features just a little better performance than Honor 9X Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a bit better looking display than Honor 9X Pro, because although it has a little smaller display and a quite lower 1080 x 2246px resolution, it also counts with a little bit higher pixels density. The Honor 9X Pro features a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition and the same 60 fps video frame rate, the Honor 9X Pro also has a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot better quality photographs, a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light photography and videos and a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels.
Honor 9X Pro features a bit more storage capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Honor 9X Pro also has a SD extension slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1's battery life is very similar to Honor 9X Pro's battery life.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.