Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-12 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.41 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black and White | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2772 x 1344 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 453 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XS Max is better than Honor Magic3 Pro, getting an 84.5 score against 72.8. The Apple iPhone XS Max design is somewhat thinner and just a little lighter than the Honor Magic3 Pro, although it was released 3 years before. IPhone XS Max features a bit better CPU than Honor Magic3 Pro, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and 2 lesser and slower cpu cores, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
IPhone XS Max features a little sharper screen than Honor Magic3 Pro, because although it has a quite lower 1242 x 2688 resolution and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit greater pixel count in each screen inch. The Honor Magic3 Pro counts with much more storage capacity for applications and games than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has more internal memory.
The Honor Magic3 Pro has a superior battery duration than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has a 4600mAh battery size. The Apple iPhone XS Max and Honor Magic3 Pro feature very similar cameras, because although the Apple iPhone XS Max has a lot smaller sensor shooting way lower quality videos and photographs and a way worse 12 mega pixels resolution camera, it also counts with a larger aperture for better photography and video in low light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.