Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-08-12 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.41 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and White | Aurora black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2772 x 1344 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 453 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is better than Honor Magic3 Pro, having a general score of 83.7 against 72.8. Both phones in this review work with Android operating system, but the LG V50 ThinQ has an older 10 version while Honor Magic3 Pro has Android 11. The LG V50 ThinQ design is just a little thinner and lighter than Honor Magic3 Pro, although it was released many years before.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a little more vivid screen than Honor Magic3 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little better pixel density and a little higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Honor Magic3 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The Honor Magic3 Pro features just a little better performance than LG V50 ThinQ, and although they both have 8 cores, the Honor Magic3 Pro also has 2 GB more RAM. Honor Magic3 Pro counts with a bit longer battery life than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 4600mAh battery capacity. The LG V50 ThinQ shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Honor Magic3 Pro, because although it has a camera with a much worse resolution and a way tinier camera sensor offering a way worse image quality, it also counts with a way larger camera aperture to capture better low light images and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.