Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-12 | 2018-10-20 |
| 6.41 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and White | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2772 x 1344 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 453 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A7 (2018) has a score of 84.2, which is better than Honor Magic3 Pro's overall score of 72.8. Galaxy A7 (2018) is an way older phone than the Honor Magic3 Pro, but it's incredibly lighter and thinner anyway. Honor Magic3 Pro counts with a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A7 (2018), and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Honor Magic3 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Honor Magic3 Pro counts with a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has a quite better display density, a better resolution of 1344 x 2772 and a little bit bigger display. Honor Magic3 Pro shoots slightly better photographs and videos than Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a camera with lot more megapixels and a way larger sensor shooting much better quality videos and pictures.
The Galaxy A7 (2018) counts with a slightly bigger memory for games and applications than Honor Magic3 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits up to 512 GB. Honor Magic3 Pro has a way better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has a 4600mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.