Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-08-12 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.41 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black and White | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2772 x 1344 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 453 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G is much better than the Honor Magic3 Pro, getting a global score of 91.8 against 72.8. These phones come with the same Android 11 operating system, so they should provide the user the same operating system features. Even though the Galaxy A71 5G is older than Honor Magic3 Pro, it's design is lighter and a little thinner.
The Honor Magic3 Pro counts with a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Honor Magic3 Pro also has more RAM memory. Honor Magic3 Pro features a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy A71 5G, because it has a higher 1344 x 2772 resolution, a little bigger display and a just a little greater pixels number per inch of screen.
Galaxy A71 5G features a better storage for games and applications than Honor Magic3 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a way better camera than Honor Magic3 Pro, because although it has a tinier sensor which provides a worse photo and video quality, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture and a back-facing camera with a much better 64 megapixels resolution.
The Honor Magic3 Pro counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than Galaxy A71 5G, because it has a 4600mAh battery size against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.