Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-12 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.41 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Black and White | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2772 x 1344 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 453 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note9 is better than Honor Magic3 Pro, getting an 87.1 score against 72.8. Galaxy Note9's body has the same thickness than Honor Magic3 Pro, but it's just a little lighter. The Samsung Galaxy Note9 features a slightly better display than Honor Magic3 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a bit greater screen density and a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 2960px.
The Galaxy Note9 features just a bit more memory capacity for applications and games than Honor Magic3 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Honor Magic3 Pro counts with a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy Note9, and although they both have 8 cores, the Honor Magic3 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Honor Magic3 Pro features just a bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because it has a 15% bigger battery size. Galaxy Note9 takes a bit better photographs and videos than Honor Magic3 Pro, because although it has a much less megapixels resolution back camera and a much tinier back-facing camera sensor which offers a way lower image and video quality, it also counts with a way bigger aperture to take better images and videos in low-light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.