Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 5.1 |
| 2021-08-12 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.41 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2772 x 1344 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 453 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.5 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 6.48 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ is just a bit better than Honor Magic3 Pro, having a general score of 79.3 against 72.8. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has the previous 5.1 version and Honor Magic3 Pro has Android 11. The Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ is an a lot older device than the Honor Magic3 Pro, but Samsung managed to make it incredibly thinner and extremely lighter anyway.
Honor Magic3 Pro has a more powerful processor than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a higher number of cores and a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy S6 edge+ features a better screen than Honor Magic3 Pro, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit better number of pixels in each inch in the screen.
Honor Magic3 Pro captures clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have a F1.9 aperture, the Honor Magic3 Pro also has a way bigger sensor and a way higher resolution back facing camera. Honor Magic3 Pro has much more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
The Honor Magic3 Pro features a superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a 53% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.