Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-08-12 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.41 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black and White | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2772 x 1344 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | -- |
| 453 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a general score of 80.1, which is much better than Honor Magic3 Pro's general score of 72.8. Despite being the best in this comparison review, the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro design is older, incredibly thicker and heavier than the Honor Magic3 Pro. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has the newer 8.0 Oreo version and Honor Magic3 Pro has Android 11 version, giving some nice extra features and better performance.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a slightly better screen than Honor Magic3 Pro, because although it has a way smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display. The Honor Magic3 Pro features a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Honor Magic3 Pro also has more RAM.
The Honor Magic3 Pro shoots greater photos and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a way smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a back camera with a way higher 50 MP resolution and a much larger sensor. Honor Magic3 Pro has more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Honor Magic3 Pro counts with just a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 2 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.