Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-12 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.41 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2772 x 1344 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 453 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is much better than Honor Magic3 Pro, getting a general score of 85.5 against 72.8. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a lighter cellphone than the Honor Magic3 Pro, but they have the same thickness. Honor Magic3 Pro counts with just a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Pocophone F1. Both of them have a Octa-Core CPU and a 8 GB RAM.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 and Honor Magic3 Pro have incredibly similar displays, although the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2246, a quite smaller display and a little bit lower pixel quantity in each inch in the display. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 shoots clearer photographs and videos than Honor Magic3 Pro, although it has a back-facing camera with way less mega-pixels resolution and a way tinier back camera sensor taking way lower quality videos and photographs, they both have the same diafragm aperture.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a lot bigger memory to store more apps and games than Honor Magic3 Pro, and although they both have equal 256 GB internal memory, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 256 GB. The Honor Magic3 Pro features a bit superior battery duration than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a 15 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.