Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.6 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black and Epi Green | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2800 x 1280 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| LTPO | Super AMOLED |
| 453 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S9 has a general score of 83.3, which is just a bit better than the Honor Magic6 Pro's overall score of 76.6. The Galaxy S9 body is a bit thinner and way lighter than the Honor Magic6 Pro. The Samsung Galaxy S9 features a bit sharper screen than Honor Magic6 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per display inch and a bit higher 1440 x 2960 resolution.
The Honor Magic6 Pro counts with a bit better performance than Galaxy S9, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Honor Magic6 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM. Honor Magic6 Pro has a way bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy S9, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
Honor Magic6 Pro features a better camera than Galaxy S9, and although they both have the same 60 fps video frame rate and the same video quality, the Honor Magic6 Pro also has a lot bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a bigger aperture and a way more mega-pixels back camera. The Honor Magic6 Pro features a much longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has an 87% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.