Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-01-22 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.18 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Just black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2310 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 398 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP10 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a is much better than Honor View20, getting an 82.9 score against 73.2. The Google Pixel 4a body has the same thickness than Honor View20, but it's a lot lighter. The Google Pixel 4a has just a bit better looking display than Honor View20, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a just a bit higher screen pixels density.
Honor View20 has a little faster CPU than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor View20 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Honor View20 shoots much better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low light photography and video, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Honor View20 also counts with a lot larger camera sensor providing a way better image quality and a back camera with way more megapixels.
Honor View20 has a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4a, because it has more internal memory capacity. Honor View20 features superior battery life than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3140mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.