Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2019-11-26 | 2021-09-30 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Galaxy black, Icelandic frost, Ocean blue and Sunrise orange | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 990 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2860 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP16 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X70 Pro has a global score of 78.3, which is just a bit better than Honor View30 Pro's 74.6 score. The vivo X70 Pro is a newer phone, and it's also thinner and somewhat lighter than Honor View30 Pro. Both of these phones have Android OS, but the vivo X70 Pro has newer 11 version and Honor View30 Pro has Android 10 version, so it gives some nice extra features and a performance increase.
Vivo X70 Pro has a display that is very similar to Honor View30 Pro's screen, and although the vivo X70 Pro has a little lower display pixels density and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2376, they both have a display of the same size. Vivo X70 Pro has a way bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Honor View30 Pro, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
The vivo X70 Pro features just a bit better hardware performance than Honor View30 Pro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Vivo X70 Pro features just a little bit longer battery duration than Honor View30 Pro, because it has 4450mAh of battery capacity against 4100mAh.
Vivo X70 Pro features a slightly better camera than Honor View30 Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low light captures and video, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the vivo X70 Pro also counts with faster 60 fps video frame rate, a lot larger camera sensor taking way higher quality photographs and a more MP back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.