Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | LG |
| 2016-05-04 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | P-OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is a bit better than the HTC 10, having a overall score of 81.3 against 75.7. LG V35 ThinQ's body is noticeably newer, just a bit lighter and somewhat thinner than HTC 10. LG V35 ThinQ and HTC 10 feature extremely similar displays, because although the LG V35 ThinQ has a bit inferior pixels count per inch of display, it also counts with a larger display and a quite better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels.
LG V35 ThinQ has a greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC 10, and although they both have a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG V35 ThinQ also has 64 GB internal memory. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit better CPU than HTC 10, because it has a greater amount of RAM and 4 more processing cores.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit better battery performance than HTC 10, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. HTC 10 has a little bit better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a lower (4K) video resolution, a camera with way less mega pixels resolution and a smaller aperture which is not so good for low light photography and video, it also counts with a lot larger back-facing camera sensor taking way higher quality photographs.
LG V35 ThinQ is not only the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also cheaper, which makes it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.