Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | LG |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-05-04 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ has a global score of 83.7, which is better than the HTC 10's 75.7 score. The LG V50 ThinQ is a way newer and a little bit thinner phone than the HTC 10, but it is heavier. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a display that is just as good as the HTC 10 one, because although the LG V50 ThinQ has a bit worse screen pixels density, it also counts with a slightly higher 1440 x 3120px resolution and a larger display.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than HTC 10, and although they both have a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG V50 ThinQ also has 128 GB internal storage capacity. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a little bit better processing power than HTC 10, because it has a larger number of cores (and they are faster) and 2 GB more RAM memory.
The LG V50 ThinQ features greater battery performance than HTC 10, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. The HTC 10 captures slightly better photographs and videos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low light photography and video, and they both have a back-facing camera with a 12 mega-pixels and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the HTC 10 also counts with faster 120 fps video frame rates and a bigger back camera sensor providing a better image quality.
Despite of being the best phone in our comparison, the LG V50 ThinQ is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.