Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| 2016-05-04 | 2020-02-03 |
| 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Aluminum | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 300.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 565 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is better than HTC 10, getting a general score of 89.7 against 75.7. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite body is noticeably newer and a little thinner, but also somewhat heavier than HTC 10. The HTC 10 counts with a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a higher amount of pixels per inch in the screen and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a little better hardware performance than HTC 10, because it has a larger number of cores and more RAM. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a superior camera than HTC 10, because although it has slower 60 frames per second video frame rates and a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with a much more mega pixels camera and a bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite features a way bigger memory capacity for applications and games than HTC 10, because although it has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. Galaxy S10 Lite has a superior battery life than HTC 10, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is also cheap compared to the HTC 10.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.