Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2016-05-04 | 2020-04-04 |
| 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 300.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| S-LCD 5 | -- |
| 565 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.45 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro is just a bit better than the HTC 10, having a score of 80.1 against 75.7. Even though Galaxy XCover FieldPro is extremely newer than HTC 10, it's notably heavier and way thicker. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a little faster CPU than HTC 10, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a greater number of cores.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a little more vivid display than HTC 10, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have an equal resolution of 1440 x 2560, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also counts with a just a bit greater pixel number in each inch in the display. HTC 10 shoots way better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for capturing photographs and/or video in low-light situations, and they both have a 12 mega pixels back-facing camera, the HTC 10 also counts with a larger sensor shooting higher quality photos and videos and a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
The HTC 10 counts with slightly more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a way better battery duration than HTC 10, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the HTC 10, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the HTC 10. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the HTC 10, giving up some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.