Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-10-01 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.16 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A70 is slightly better than HTC Desire 10 pro, getting a global score of 76.9 against 74.3. Both of these phones have Android OS, but Galaxy A70 has 10 version while HTC Desire 10 pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version. Galaxy A70's body has the same thickness than HTC Desire 10 pro, but it is a little heavier.
HTC Desire 10 pro and Samsung Galaxy A70 both count with extremely similar displays, because although the Samsung Galaxy A70 has a just a little worse pixels density, it also counts with a bigger display and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. The Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a bit better hardware performance than HTC Desire 10 pro, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy A70 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
HTC Desire 10 pro counts with just a bit bigger memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy A70, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB. The HTC Desire 10 pro takes much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy A70, because although it has a lot tinier aperture, it also counts with a bigger sensor which offers a higher photo and video quality.
The Galaxy A70 has a superior battery duration than HTC Desire 10 pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.