Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2016-10-01 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.16 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a score of 98, which is much better than HTC Desire 10 pro's 74.3 overall score. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G body is way newer, but noticeably heavier and somewhat thicker than HTC Desire 10 pro. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has 13 version and HTC Desire 10 pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit more powerful processing unit than HTC Desire 10 pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with just a bit better looking screen than HTC Desire 10 pro, because it has a higher count of pixels per inch in the screen, a way better 1440 x 3200px resolution and a larger display.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a bit bigger memory capacity for apps and games than HTC Desire 10 pro, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures much better photos and videos than HTC Desire 10 pro, because it has a larger diafragm aperture to capture better images in low-light environments, a larger back camera sensor providing a better image quality and a way more MP back camera.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a way better battery duration than HTC Desire 10 pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.