Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
3G OnlySM-N9000
| Global Score | |
| 53.7 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 4.1.2 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| -- | 2013-09-04 |
| 5.19 x 2.61 x 0.40 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.23 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 217 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 chipset | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A5 (Dual-Core 1000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz + Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 203 (245 MHz) GPU | ARM Mali-T628 MP6 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 7.74 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.26 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 34.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.71 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Micro SIM | Micro SIM |
| 3.5 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1650mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 11 hours talk time | 490 hours standby time 20 hours talk time |
| 3.52 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 is a lot better than the HTC Desire 300, getting a overall score of 80.7 against 53.7. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Note 3 has a newer 5.0 version and HTC Desire 300 has Android 4.1.2, so it gives you a couple additional features and improved performance. The Galaxy Note 3 is a thinner but a lot heavier phone than the HTC Desire 300.
The Galaxy Note 3 counts with a more powerful processor than HTC Desire 300, because it has more RAM, a much better GPU and a higher number of cores. The Galaxy Note 3 counts with a much better screen than HTC Desire 300, because it has a way better resolution of 1920 x 1080, a lot greater quantity of pixels per display inch and a really larger screen.
The Galaxy Note 3 counts with a much better camera than HTC Desire 300, because it has a lot larger aperture for better photos and video in low-light environments and a much more mega pixels back-facing camera. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a much better storage capacity to store more apps and games than HTC Desire 300, and although they both have a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 64 GB, the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 also has 60 GB more internal storage.
The Galaxy Note 3 features a very superior battery lifetime than HTC Desire 300, because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity instead of 1650mAh.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Galaxy Note 3 is also cheap compared to the other phone, making this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.