Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 58.9 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | LG |
| Android 4.1 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2013-05-23 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.31 x 2.64 x 0.36 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.59 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| S-LCD 2 | OLED |
| 245 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A5 (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 203 (245 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.06 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.60 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.37 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1860mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 539 hours standby time 11.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.76 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ has a score of 83.7, which is a lot better than the HTC Desire 600's overall score of 58.9. Both of these devices use Android OS (Operating System), but LG V50 ThinQ has a newer 10 version while HTC Desire 600 has Android 4.1 version, so it gives you some extra features. The LG V50 ThinQ body is way newer and just a bit thinner, but incredibly heavier than the HTC Desire 600.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a faster processing unit than HTC Desire 600, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with a larger amount of RAM memory and a larger number of cores (and they are faster). LG V50 ThinQ features a better looking screen than HTC Desire 600, because it has a lot larger screen, a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3120px and a way greater screen density.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a way better camera than HTC Desire 600, because it has a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a way larger camera aperture to take better photography and videos in low light environments and a camera with much more megapixels. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much greater storage capacity to install games and applications than HTC Desire 600, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much better battery life than HTC Desire 600, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
The LG V50 ThinQ is not only the best devices in this comparison, but it's also cheaper, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.