Compare phones
Samsung Droid Charge
SCH-i510| Global Score | |
| 49.2 | 54.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 2.2, 2.1 | Android 2.3, 2.2 |
| -- | 2011-01-06 |
| 4.69 x 2.36 x 0.47 inches | 5.11 x 2.66 x 0.46 inches |
| 4.76 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 200.00 | $ 90.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.7 inches | 4.3 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 480 x 800 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 252 pixels per inch | 217 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.7 | 7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 MSM7627A chipset | Samsung Exynos 3 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A5 (Single-Core 1000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A8 (Single-Core 1000 MHz) processor |
| 384 MB RAM | -- |
| Adreno 200 (enhanced) (200 MHz) GPU | PowerVR SGX540 (200 MHz) GPU |
| 7.47 | 7.38 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 2 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 1.32 | 3.22 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution |
| 5.5 | 7.15 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| EV-DO A and CDMA | LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA |
| 2.6 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1400mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1600mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 136 hours standby time 6.5 hours talk time | 280 hours standby time 11 hours talk time |
| 3.12 | 3.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 3.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Droid Charge has a score of 54.1, which is slightly better than HTC Desire CDMA's score of 49.2. Both of these devices use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Droid Charge has newer 2.3 version and HTC Desire CDMA has Android 2.2, so it provides the user some nice extra features. The Samsung Droid Charge body is just a little bit thinner but just a little heavier than HTC Desire CDMA.
HTC Desire CDMA has a bit better processing power than Samsung Droid Charge. They have a 200 megahertz graphics processing unit and 1 CPU cores. The HTC Desire CDMA counts with a better screen than Samsung Droid Charge, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 800 x 480 pixels, the HTC Desire CDMA also counts with a quite greater pixels density.
The Samsung Droid Charge takes a lot better videos and photos than HTC Desire CDMA, because it has a camera in the back with lot more megapixels. Samsung Droid Charge has a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC Desire CDMA. Both have an external memory slot that holds up to 32 GB.
The Samsung Droid Charge has superior battery life than HTC Desire CDMA, because it has 1600mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Samsung Droid Charge is also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.