Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 54.3 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | LG |
| Android 4.0, 2.3 | -- |
| 2011-03-22 | 2017-09-21 |
| 5.00 x 2.60 x 0.47 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Purple and Silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 310.00 | $ 307.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| S-LCD | P-OLED |
| 256 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S3 MSM8660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Scorpion (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 220 (266 MHz) GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.01 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 1 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 2.72 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 6.05 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| EV-DO A and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 3.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1730mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.6 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30 is way better than the HTC EVO 3D, getting a 79.1 score against 54.3. The LG V30 is a a lot newer cellphone, and it's also a little lighter and a lot thinner than the HTC EVO 3D. LG V30 features a brighter screen than HTC EVO 3D, because it has a really larger display, a much better resolution of 1440 x 2880 and a way higher display pixel density.
The LG V30 has a better CPU than HTC EVO 3D, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with more cpu cores and 3 GB more RAM memory. The LG V30 has a much better storage capacity for apps and games than HTC EVO 3D, because it has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal memory capacity.
LG V30 features a way better battery lifetime than HTC EVO 3D, because it has a 91 percent more battery size. The LG V30 features a lot better camera than HTC EVO 3D, because it has a back camera with a way higher 16 mega pixels resolution and a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
LG V30 is not only the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheap compared to the HTC EVO 3D, which makes it easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.